In the given case, department had blocked the electronic credit ledger of the petitioner and the same was unblocked after expiry of 2 years. As per Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Rules 2017, electronic credit could have been blocked for a period of one year. However, in this case the department had blocked the electronic credit ledger for more than one year.
Being aggrieved by the action of the department, the taxpayer has filed the writ before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court for seeking interest on the input tax credit which was blocked by the department even after the period of one year.
The petitioner before the Hon'ble High Court contended that the action of the department for blocking of input tax credit for a period after the expiry of one year from the date of blocking electronic credit ledger is wholly unlawful and unjustified.
Petitioner further explained the relevant provision of blocking of the input tax credit where it is clearly mentioned that the department cannot block the input tax credit of the taxpayer for more than 1 year. The relevant provision of Rule 86A of the CGST Rules is reproduced below:
As per the above-mentioned rules it was contended by the petitioner that department has to unblock the input tax credit within 1 year.
Hon'ble Delhi High Court admitted this writ and have asked revenue authority to file affidavits before the next hearing. The matter is pending before the court and is listed for next hearing on 14.09.2022.
It will be interesting to see the final decision of the Hon'ble High Court. A favorable judgement will provide a relief to the taxpayer towards the loss actually suffered due to blocked input tax credit.
We shall keep you updated with the final order in the due course of time.
FIDES DISTRIBUTION PVT LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI SOUTH AND ORS (2022-TIOL-218-HC-DEL-GST)
BT Associates
Call: 033 2534-2717 /
033 6451-8729
Mail: enquiry@btassociate.com